Hoy vemos en El Pais publicado un mapa de España de cancer
http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/09/29/med ... 93167.html

Moderador: Fisio
Yo creo que es coincidencia, en tarragona no se dan esos criterios, y tienen varias. Las centrales nucleares son obligatorias hoy en dia si quieres independencia energetica y ser una nacion respetable, franco en su epoca hizo un buen trabajo, que llevan echando por tierra muchos años.Fisio escribió:Es solo una coincidencia? No, tenemos estudios además que documentan el aumento del cancer en los sitios cercanos a centrales
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240377/
Esto no lo vais a oir en los medios en la vida.
Mira el estudio que puse arriba, es español, sobre Garoña y cancer de estómago:Valanor escribió:Yo creo que es coincidencia, en tarragona no se dan esos criterios, y tienen varias. Las centrales nucleares son obligatorias hoy en dia si quieres independencia energetica y ser una nacion respetable, franco en su epoca hizo un buen trabajo, que llevan echando por tierra muchos años.Fisio escribió:Es solo una coincidencia? No, tenemos estudios además que documentan el aumento del cancer en los sitios cercanos a centrales
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1240377/
Esto no lo vais a oir en los medios en la vida.
Otros tipos de cancer no sale una diferencia tan clara, pero si en zonas de procesado de uranioIn the Garoña area an unexpected, higher risk of stomach cancer was detected in both sexes, apparently linked to proximity to the nuclear power plant
pattern of solid-tumor mortality in the vicinity of uranium cycle facilities, basically characterized by excess lung [relative risk (RR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.25] and renal cancer mortality (RR 1.37, 95% CI, 1.07-1.76)
Trillo en GuadalajaraExcess risk of leukemia mortality was, however, observed in the vicinity of the uranium-processing facilities in Andújar [RR, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.64] and Ciudad Rodrigo (RR, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-3.08). Excess risk of multiplemyeloma mortality was found in the area surrounding the Zorita nuclear power plant
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12819287Cancer risk around the nuclear power plants of Trillo and Zorita (Spain).
Silva-Mato A1, Viana D, Fernández-SanMartín MI, Cobos J, Viana M.
Author information
Abstract
AIM:
To investigate the association between cancer risk and proximity of place of residence to the Guadalajara nuclear power plants: Trillo and Zorita.
METHODS:
Case-control study. Cases were patients admitted with cancer and controls were non-tumorous patients, both admitted to Guadalajara Hospital (period 1988-99). Exposure factor: place of residence (areas within 10, 20, and 30 km of each plant). Odds ratios (ORs) of those areas closest to the plants were calculated with respect to those furthest away; a linear trend analysis was also performed.
RESULTS:
In the extreme areas in the vicinity of Trillo, an OR of 1.71 was obtained (95% CI 1.15 to 2.53), increasing in magnitude in the subgroup of more radioinducible tumours and in the period considered as post-latency (1997-99). Risk increased linearly with proximity to the two plants, significantly in Trillo (p < 0.01) but not in Zorita (p = 0.19).
CONCLUSIONS:
There is an association between proximity of residence to Trillo and cancer risk, although the limitations of the study should be kept in mind when interpreting the possible causal relation.